I discuss and explain how I understand 'motivated reasoning’, and ways to avoid it.
All in general audience
I discuss and explain how I understand 'motivated reasoning’, and ways to avoid it.
Paragraph breaks and other syntactical breaks are used to imply different but interacting abstract concepts. Also, three tips for myself to improve my writing process.
An understanding of patterns of behaviors within institutions, taking notes from natural selection and the works of G.A. Cohen and Anwar Shaikh.
Stray thoughts about how the speed of our decision-making can change the kinds of actions we end up taking.
This is the joke that made me understand what Wittgenstein meant when he said “that a serious and good philosophical work could be written that would consist entirely of jokes (without being facetious).”
I think it is morally acceptable for people to care more for those closer to them, but only if we also morally require that people also extend such aid to those structurally deprived and disadvantaged.
Notes & Reflections on Analyzing Politics: Rationality, Behavior, and Institutions (2nd Ed.) by Kenneth A. Shepsle, Chapters 9 and 10 on ‘Collective Action’ and ‘Public Goods’.
Why are public goods and services so tied up with private contractors and private money? Some game theory…
The Madisonian model of American government is why mass movements in America tend to get co-opted and folded into institutional politics. This weakens mass movements, and is an issue if we want anything resembling a revolution in the United States. I examine what possibilities we have going forward to a Left American Revolution.
When we discuss inequality and injustice in our modern economy, should we put less emphasis on the asymmetries of ownership of physical means of production, and more emphasis on the unequal possession of knowledge and information?
I discuss ‘monopolies founded on intellectual property’ and ‘the economic role of universities to produce social capital’.
THE Second IN A SERIES RESPONDING TO THE FOUR ONLINE 'ABCS OF SOCIALISM’ LECTURES.
I SUMMARIZE AND RESPOND TO Adaner Usmani’s ARGUMENT about how leftists should consider the role of human nature in society.
I take a consequentialist approach to measuring the success of war-crime trials. Trials analyzed include the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, the Nuremburg Trials, and those after the Rwandan genocide.
Introduced in the essay is the concept of closure: a desirable end to conflict among all parties involved, arrived at by successfully addressing the ideological/societal rift at the root of the initial conflict.